Disable Preloader

CaseLaw

Egonu V. Egonu (1978) CLR 11(f) (SC)

Judgement delivered on November 24th 1978

Brief

  • Declaration of title to land
  • Damages for trespass
  • Evaluation of evidence
  • Onitsha customary law

Facts

The appeal deals in the main, with a claim founded on a testamentary disposition of interest in land allegedly acquired by purchase under customary law by the eldest son of a prosperous man from his father in the earliest twenties, 1924 to be more exact. The parties were of Ibo origin whose personal law was Osomari customary law i.e. native law and customary law i.e. native law and custom although the land is situated in Onitsha and parties lived and died on land. The parties to the alleged sale are dead and the devisees the plaintiffs/appellant herein, conscious of the devise and the need to assert their rights under the will which were being wantonly infringed by the respondents ad nauseam instituted an action by writ of summons filed in the High court, Onitsha then in Judicial Division of the High Court of eastern Nigeria but now Onitsha Judicial Division of the High Court of Anambra state for, in terms appearing on the amended statement of claim:

  • "1.
    Declaration of title to the landed property now known and called 40, New market Road, Onitsha and more particularly delineated and verged pink in the plan No. PO/E.30/65.
  • 2.
    £5 damages against the 1st and 2nd defendants for trespass on the said landed property.
  • 3.
    Injunction restraining the 1st defendant her servants or agents from doing anything on the said landed property inconsistent with the plaintiffs’ ownership and possession thereof.
  • 4.
    Injunction restraining the 2nd defendant his servants or agents from erect¬ing any building on the said landed property and or entering on the said landed property and or entering or remaining thereon or in anyway doing anything thereon inconsistent with the plaintiffs' ownership and possession thereof."

Pleadings were ordered, filed and served and the matter ultimately came up for trial before Oputa, J. (as he then was). After a protracted trial wherein the is¬sues raised were vigorously contested and moves for amicable settlement out of court flopped, the learned trial judge delivered a considered judgment, dismis¬sing all the items of claim as unproved.

The plaintiff appealed to the Supreme Court mainly on the ground of assessment and evaluation of evidence.

Issues

  • --> Whether failure to make out a case Justifying the assumption of jurisdiction of...
    Read More